000			02973cam a22003618i 4500
003			BR-SpNIC
005			20230920172933.0
008			200916s2021 enk b 001 0 eng
010			_a 2020042241
020			_a9781107181373 _q(hardback)
020			_a9781316632635 _q(paperback)
020			_z9781316850350 _q(epub)
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cBR-SpNIC
042			_apcc
050	0	0	_aK3263 _b.S55 2021
082	0	0	_a323.44/8 _223
090			_a323.44 _bS628p
100	1		_aSkinner-Thompson, Scott, _d1982- _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aPrivacy at the margins / _cScott Skinner-Thompson, Colorado Law School.
263			_a2101
264		1	_aCambridge, United Kingdom ; _aNew York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _c2021.
300			_apages cm
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
505	0		_aNo privacy in public = no privacy for the precarious -- Performative privacy in theory and practice -- Performative privacy's payoffs -- Containing corporate & privatized surveillance -- Outing privacy as anti-subordination -- Equal protection privacy.
520			_a"Privacy often suffers in courts of law and as a legislative or regulatory priority. Privacy, in effect, is marginalized as a right and frequently ranked below security or law enforcement concerns. Often it is even ranked below administrative, personal, or corporate convenience. At the same time, privacy is of acute significance for members of marginalized communities-queer folk, racial and religious minorities, women, immigrants, people living with disabilities, people living in poverty, workers, and those at the intersections. Why is it that privacy receives limited protection from courts and legislatures notwithstanding the heightened necessity of privacy for communities fighting for lived equality; communities currently at the margins? What are the particular doctrinal limitations of privacy law that exacerbate the precariousness of marginalized communities? Are there nevertheless undercurrents within certain judicial contexts that, if emphasized, might lead to greater protection for those in precarious positions? Are there ways of thinking about privacy rights that might lead to more robust privacy protection by courts and lawmakers and better capture why privacy is of critical importance, particularly for vulnerable communities? Put differently, can privacy be transformed from a liberal, individualistic value into an anti-oppression legal tool?"-- _cProvided by publisher.
650		0	_aPrivacy, Right of.
776	0	8	_iOnline version: _aSkinner-Thompson, Scott, 1982- _tPrivacy at the margins _dCambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2021 _z9781316850350 _w(DLC) 2020042242
906			_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg
942			_2ddc _cL _k323.44 _mS628p
999			_c2319 _d2319